The Data Said Clinton Would Win. Why You Shouldn’t Have Believed It.

Predictive analytics, and election forecasting in particular, remains a young science. Experts say some of the models could be off 15 to 20 percent.Predictive analytics, and election forecasting in particular, remains a young science. Experts say some of the models could be off 15 to 20 percent. The New York Times Predictive analytics, and election forecasting in particular, remains a young science. Experts say some of the models could be off 15 to 20 percent. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/technology/the-data-said-clinton-would-win-why-you-shouldnt-have-believed-it.html?partner=IFTTT Predictive analytics, and election forecasting in particular, remains a young science. Experts say some of the models could be off 15 to 20 percent.
By STEVE LOHR and NATASHA SINGER from NYT Technology http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/technology/the-data-said-clinton-would-win-why-you-shouldnt-have-believed-it.html?partner=IFTTT
via IFTTT